As the world embraces the advent of high powered intelligent works of the new age, more and more areas of labor have become less strenuous especially that people in the contemporary times are quite open-minded about these changes. Today, more than ever, jobs of most professionals are rather enjoyable not because of numerous benefits employees obtain, but the amount of time they save while doing their tasks of the day. What is more, many people nowadays are given enough time to do their hobbies and special pursuits.
However, along with such changes are crucial consequences by which customary practices must be altered. Whether they are linked to business or any other professions, practitioners are asked to do much more than what is required from them for if not, adverse effects on profitability and efficiency can be encountered. In the legal practice, many are wondering about the significance of electronic discovery statistics.
Electronic discovery market is never just any trend. This is a core of the protection law in the legal practice that encompasses acumen and expertise of different legal professionals including those concentrating on records management, forensics and information technology. Although it is essentially practiced in the United States and in many European countries, several other territories show relative interest about the implementation of such practice.
Litigation or regulatory proceedings necessitate proper predictive-coding system and technology-based document reviews. With the density of any legal tasks, the legal office simply needs to seek out high-speed processing software efficient enough in categorizing data and in executing apposite indexing.
Sophisticated technologies like this do not only provide maximum ease in quantifying data obtained from previous and current samples. This can deliver accurate results but users are cautioned about the process if they do not really know how this is properly executed. Only through effective use of the system that this can work out well.
Lawyers should at least do their share in reviewing all data manually to ascertain consistency and reliability. Review process can take a long time but it is necessary to confirm results. The software is specially designed to bring reliable statistical results but it does not mean attorneys are excused from doing their duty.
Results obtained from manual review, however, are rather tested for consistency than sophisticated sampling produced by such software. Technology-assisted review is believed to yield precise results with lesser effort. Nonetheless, manual reviews are considered more effective albeit being strenuous and confounding.
Meanwhile, in regard to reliability, technology-assisted process remains an important subject for discussion though its cost-effectiveness has been remarkable. Human review process must be carried out not only once. Results need to be compared several times so as to ensure consistencies.
Moreover, knowing how important sampling familiarity is in obtaining correct results, it is best for legal professionals to consult experts of varied scientific phenomena and such technology. Experts can clearly show them exact sampling process and establish precise sample sizes. Also, they can ascertain confidence level on statistical inferences and point to standard formula in the process.
However, along with such changes are crucial consequences by which customary practices must be altered. Whether they are linked to business or any other professions, practitioners are asked to do much more than what is required from them for if not, adverse effects on profitability and efficiency can be encountered. In the legal practice, many are wondering about the significance of electronic discovery statistics.
Electronic discovery market is never just any trend. This is a core of the protection law in the legal practice that encompasses acumen and expertise of different legal professionals including those concentrating on records management, forensics and information technology. Although it is essentially practiced in the United States and in many European countries, several other territories show relative interest about the implementation of such practice.
Litigation or regulatory proceedings necessitate proper predictive-coding system and technology-based document reviews. With the density of any legal tasks, the legal office simply needs to seek out high-speed processing software efficient enough in categorizing data and in executing apposite indexing.
Sophisticated technologies like this do not only provide maximum ease in quantifying data obtained from previous and current samples. This can deliver accurate results but users are cautioned about the process if they do not really know how this is properly executed. Only through effective use of the system that this can work out well.
Lawyers should at least do their share in reviewing all data manually to ascertain consistency and reliability. Review process can take a long time but it is necessary to confirm results. The software is specially designed to bring reliable statistical results but it does not mean attorneys are excused from doing their duty.
Results obtained from manual review, however, are rather tested for consistency than sophisticated sampling produced by such software. Technology-assisted review is believed to yield precise results with lesser effort. Nonetheless, manual reviews are considered more effective albeit being strenuous and confounding.
Meanwhile, in regard to reliability, technology-assisted process remains an important subject for discussion though its cost-effectiveness has been remarkable. Human review process must be carried out not only once. Results need to be compared several times so as to ensure consistencies.
Moreover, knowing how important sampling familiarity is in obtaining correct results, it is best for legal professionals to consult experts of varied scientific phenomena and such technology. Experts can clearly show them exact sampling process and establish precise sample sizes. Also, they can ascertain confidence level on statistical inferences and point to standard formula in the process.
About the Author:
The following website features up-to-date electronic discovery statistics for all your needs. For further info, you are welcome to check out our web pages now at http://www.statisticsforlawyers.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment